The councilmen also take care of of the urbanstico aspect defining streets and squares, establishing widths and extensions, everything on behalf of optimum paisagstico aspect for the benefit of all. so that the waters of rains do not empocem the curbs is coated with burnt adobe bricks. The Chamber did not allow that free or loafing citizens were rambling for the village. Received any denunciation against one from them he was the same summoned to appear in hearing and to declare in judgment what it made, of what lived, if had relatives in the village, if possua good or then to change itself for another clientele. The propagandist baderneiros and also were summoned to adopt moderate behavior or to take another route. The same value for the fuxiqueiros and disquieters of families, who simply were enxotados. In July of 1588 the people if congregated in the Chamber and was determined that the Village of So Paulo it needed a First church. Exactly that in May of 1589 Chamber has asked for officially to Governor General sending of vicar, bell and necessary ornaments for so dreamed First truth is that it alone would be inaugurated in 1632 and with a bell loaned for the Chamber, whose doorman was without having as to convoke the inhabitants for the hearings at least up to 1645, when the bell finally was taken in return to the headquarters of the city council. It had in the Village of So Paulo some religious parties and some profane ones. Not to lack to people to same a Chamber it determined that all the inhabitants appeared fine of two tostes duly warned. For who it lacked to the procession of Isabel Saint the fine was saltier: two a thousand kings. in 1620 the Chamber created ' ' Body of Quadrilheiros' ' that they were the block inspectors, people in charge to watch over for the order, behavior and to protect the decency of the families.
As well as many natural phenomena, the man was rank in question and turned object research (or, if to want, research problem). However, to think and to take conclusions regarding the man are a little different of the other phenomena, therefore it is not only to knowledge of the studied object, but also about self-knowledge. Moreover, we are ahead of a very ambiguous animal, difficult conceptual definition. None another animal presented, in all natural history, a so inclined character the changes how much the man. We can compare as many men of distant cultures how much those that divide the same culture: much more wide of what the other animals, between a man and another one have a clamorous difference, and such difference exceeds the organic limits; it is present in each decision that the man is capable to consider, through its personal or relative conceptions to the culture which it is part. For better understanding of the concept of the man it seems us of much importance to trace a description with some conceptions thought about elapsing of history of the philosophy, since such research is not only sent to the cassirerianas reflections, but to the problems considered for a Philosophical Anthropology. We could make a long research on the conceptions of man leaving of the old eastern philosophies, of millenarian tradition, that also would be of great importance to understand the phenomenon human, but the main objective of this recapitulation is to catch the basic aspects that had influenced the boarding of the symbolic animal man while, and, therefore, it will be more reasonable to initiate for the old Greeks, only searching some basic concepts to enrich reflections of posterior paragraphs. To speak on the conceptions conceived in Greece Old perhaps either the task most arduous, therefore we have an old and very peculiar culture here.
For example, the wood while substance is power, therefore can assume diverse forms. The according to estagirita form is the act, therefore, as well as the power she is conditional for the act, equally the substance it is for the performance of the form. In this relation between form and substance in the composition of the substance, the act prevails on the power, in how much that in the form, it has the exclusiveness of the act, and in the substance, it has a mesclagem between power and act. The substance, as well as harnesses is responsible for the finitude of the beings, that is, they are limiter of the form and the act. But the beings incorporeal, that they are exclusively formal, they are perfect, immovable and perpetual, that is, they are pure acts. Consideraes final Therefore, Aristotle influenced for the effective problem in the philosophy, on the question of devir, resultant of the fidgets of the daily pay-socrticos, mainly Parmnides and Heraclitus, establishes the concept of act and power and the relation between itself in the degree of importance of the value, the causalidade and the composition and the relation of them with the composition of the substance.