First World War

Myths about dogs I love. Interestingly, the falsehoods maintained through generations, and watch them grow and flourish and embellishment with the addition of each new group of converts to their cause. Impression I am in the holiness which is given to what is published, even ideas that have no basis in fact. As a writer, is how easy it is error-Mar proclaim as true, and that what is published is only as reliable as with-knowledge and integrity of its author-ity can. But the general reader has a to-that of fidelity to the written word. And this fidelity makes it possible for myths about the structure, behavior and training techniques for dogs, continue to recruit new adherents to their causes you, though they may not have any basis in reality. Then, through decades now, these debates continue as new generations of fans from both sides argue their points of view.

One of the most enduring of these debates is that the inter-ordinators support using techniques trains-up with food and coaches who abjure them. This confrontation is at least since the First World War, when there is great competition in training dogs between the English and Germans. English coaches of that era techniques used with food. On the other hand, the Germans held it securely-you that dogs should work not for food but for the love of his master, plus a good dose of discipline. Ac-tually there are trainers which seem unable to distinguish the difference between love and discipline. Then came BF Skinner to scare the scientific community with their boxes and trained pigeons and rodents.

Counterpoint

And given scientific status to something that had been known long time: that the train-ing with food works. Several more books, dog training is based on its methods. Point and Counterpoint What are the most com-mon objections to the use of food given? And what is the truth about them? What they never say they object to is that the train-ing does not work with food. If not, no contro-versy would be no because nobody would use. In my per-sonally I like the use of food, because it would not work in the presence of pain and this ensures that the train-ing will be nonviolent. You can not use harsh corrections and food for fear simultaneously suppressing the appetite.

Asus-graph A dog will not eat. So while the enemies of the food support is effective, complain about other things. WORK FOR A DOG TO LOVE, NOT FOR FOOD: Does this mean that if I train my dogs with food they are going to hate me? I have news for you. My dogs love me. And whether the train with food or not, they will continue loving her affection for "is based on the time we spent together and our relationship, not all the food presented to them on your plate at the end of the day, or because some of their food may come in the form of small gifts that can win. TRAINING WITH FOOD is unnatural: What are the primary motivations of a salt-vaje dog? If we speak of true pe-natural rros as wolves and coyotes What motivates them? Basically what motivates them is food and sex: the food to stay alive and perpetuate sex for generations.