public home is the sector of management of revenues and expenditures of the State and lies beyond the domestic home and the market economy. I agree with the following point mentioned in the book society should be organized in such way that generate the feeling that belongs to it in its members get. According to John Rawls of political philosophy task to elaborate a distributive justice which can be shared by all its members. This theory has several difficulties. One of them is the fact that there are groups with different ways of seeing life in pluralistic societies. How to organize the coexistence between different points of view is a problem. Quoted from the book the man you want to be happy, instead the citizen expects justice be done by society to goods as to be able to start your project happy. The following phrase seemed interesting: only a person who feels Member of a particular community, which proposes a particular life form, only who is acknowledged by the community as one of their own and takes on his identity as a member of it, may feel motivated to become involved in it.
Not enough justice to live, make lack sense and happiness found in communities. Define us the term of citizenship as: A mediator concept, since it integrates the demands for Justice and those who are members of the community by the feeling of belonging. It is clear that sociality is the capability of coexistence, but also to participate in the building of a just society, in which citizens can develop their qualities and acquire virtues. Why who surrenders to their private affairs ends up losing, not only your real citizenship, but also his humanity. We mentioned that the countries that have taken the welfare State body would have to transform a citizenry accustomed to demand in a citizenry accustomed to participate in common projects, assuming responsibilities.
A society that wish to take into account this approach, should be aware that undertakes to meet strong demands as: the guarantee that the participation of citizens in public affairs, whether political or economic, will occur in conditions that make it significant, implying radically transform society. I liked this book by the way in which the author proposes a citizenship that represents a point of Union between individual sentiente reason and the values and norms that we have as humanizadores. The author constructs a theory of citizenship can convert to the whole of humanity in a community based on solidarity.